Tuesday, July 5, 2011
Wednesday, June 1, 2011
Google Executive Chairman Schmidt Says He ‘Screwed Up’ in Social Media
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-06-01/schmidt-singles-out-google-apple-facebook-amazon-as-leaders.html
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Social Media in the work place
Saturday, April 30, 2011
The Power Of Social Media.Book becomes bestseller before it's published; still doesn't even have a publication date. "With out social media 'something like this would have been impossible even a few years ago'”
A Whim, A Book, And, Wow!
By REYHAN HARMANCI
Published: April 28, 2011
Thursday, April 28, 2011
Public Diplomacy Shifts to Social Media
Recently, I found this interesting article that America.gov, a major global public diplomacy website is shutting down. States Department that organized the portal decided that the portal is not as effective anymore. It decided to switch its efforts and information to social media. From now to distribute the information they will use Facebook, Twitter and YouTube.
Is that a good decision? In my opinion some organization are blinded by today’s technological progress and development. Social media interaction can be very effective. However, not until it is used appropriate way. The State Department cannot forget that the aspects of social media is not anymore for sending information but also to engage the public and create relationship with the target audience. Without this concept in mind it is sure that its attempt could be a big failure. Many companies and organizations found out about it very fast by spending most of their promotion budget on social media while not forming a good SM strategy, which in consequence brought to a huge losses.(example: Pepsi Refresh Project) But let’s see what the future will bring for the State Department and its public diplomacy shift.
What do you think about this?
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0411/Public_diplomacy_shifts_to_social_media.html#
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
The Royal Wedding Will (Also) Not Be Tweeted
Twitter Hedge Funds?
- Today, computers make most trading decisions. Some estimate that between 46 and 73% of equity trading volumes in the U.S. are made by these high-frequency systems, which are designed to use computer speed and processing power to crunch massive amounts of data and seek small profits on enormous trading volume. A system that can reliably make a few cents per trade on hundreds of thousands of trades per day is quite valuable to a firm.
- Social networks have unique qualities that make them particularly well-suited for the machines that now dominate Wall Street. The sheer amount of content produced on social networks is enormous and continues to grow. The content production itself is a voluntary act. Even the ways with which social networks interact with one another –- the so-called semantic web -– make content production across multiple networks extremely quick. And of course most social media content is public at some level, especially when a carefully programmed algorithm is doing the searching.
- Other competitive advantages are going away. This growing enthusiasm for social content isn’t so much borne from newness as it is from necessity. As the BBC recently reported, the speed at which high-frequency trading can function is approaching its physical limitation. Speed is a competitive advantage for these platforms but it’s quickly becoming ubiquitous. If and when speed –- called “low-latency connectivity” -– is further commoditized, firms will require a new way to get a leg up on the competition.